Revisiting Film with the Canon AE-1 Program

Update (29 MAR 2017): I've learned quite a bit since writing this post, the most important lesson being that my comments about the look of the color film were incorrect; in reality, I just hadn't nailed the exposure properly. I consider this post a slice of time on my journey to mastery, so I'll leave it as is. Just keep these things in mind as you read on.

Film always has and always will intrigue me; nostalgia is the immediate thought which comes to mind. While I cannot completely translate the feeling, there is something hypnotizing about sifting through negatives and old photographs. It is something I remember doing quite often as a kid. I have yet to enter a darkroom, but I believe just having knowledge of that crucial step is part of the intrigue--to know there is a complex, if not magical process involved in getting an image from capture to final print. I never learned any of the basics on film honestly, and in retrospect, I should have gone there first. The part of me that vividly remembers life before the Internet thinks that there is something a bit lost in the immediacy of digital. For instance, I think constant CHIMPing is one of the worst things a new photographer can do; it's a distraction more often than not. You learn a lot from taking a shot, writing down your settings (most of the time), seeing the print, and learning what you did right or wrong. Then there's that element where if you eff up a frame (or an entire roll), there is no do-over--just money blown and hopefully lessons learned. I love that reality. Without the safety net of advanced electronics, you have to (at the very least) get better at technical execution. Vision is another thing. When I began really digging into photography, I sometimes wondered why some seasoned photographers chose to stick with film in this digital age. I at once thought it odd and alluring, as though they were privy to something I hadn't yet earned the right to know. I get it now; I've developed a greater appreciation for the art. From a practical standpoint, I will continue to employ both avenues. However, film for me will always represent the true essence of photography.

The thought of slowing down sparked my interest to revisit film, so after a bit of research I settled on the Canon AE-1 Program. Oddly, I haven't, nor do I care to use the "program" function (I prefer full-manual even with digital), but I found a decent copy with the 50/1.8 for a good price. I won't do a gear review as that's not really my thing. I'll leave that to the experts (true or self-proclaimed), although I will say I love shooting with this camera and leave it at that. This is just my take on the experience of shooting film again and learning along the way.

For film I chose what was available locally to start--no Kodak Tri-X or Ilford Delta to be found. Below are a few samples of the outcome. After having the film scanned by a local lab, I imported into Lightroom 5 only to add metadata. None of the photos are retouched.

All photos in this series were shot with the Canon AE-1 Program with 50mm 1.8 lens available from multiple sellers on Amazon.


Kodak Gold 200

 The Mrs. in deep thought.  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

The Mrs. in deep thought.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

Kodak Gold 200 is just one of the films I saw and wanted to try out. I'm no expert, but I'm not impressed with it. I like the desaturated look that it has, but the tones and contrast look a little odd to me. Some might like it, but I won't buy it again.


Kodak Ektar 100

 Taking a break from  Fasching .  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

Taking a break from Fasching.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

 Best friends after a makeup party.  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

Best friends after a makeup party.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

 A touch of sunlight.  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

A touch of sunlight.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

The Kodak Ektar 100 is one I'll definitely buy again. It has the slightly desaturated look lending to the nostalgic feel, and the tones are more consistent. It also seems to have a greater latitude for error. There were shots I just had a bad feeling about, but they turned out okay.


Ilford HP5 Plus 400

 Just before bedtime.  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

Just before bedtime.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

 Another quiet Sunday in  Kusel .  ©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

Another quiet Sunday in Kusel.

©2015 MakeMoves Photography | No Pretension

I'm partial to black & white, so the Ilford HP5 Plus 400 wins me over here; I love the grain and contrast. I did end up overexposing more frames than I expected, so maybe this one isn't so forgiving. I hear the Ilford Delta 400 beats it, so that'll be my next purchase.


A couple of very talented film shooters I've come across recently are Lester Cannon (check out his features on The Phoblographer here and here) and Rolland András Flinta, both out of Germany (by way of Cali and Hungary respectively). Warning: some of their images are NSFW, but they both have a fine-art approach towards nudity. If you're comfortable with that, you shouldn't take offense. Take some time and check out their work.

If anyone has any insight to offer regarding archiving, film types, other film shooters, etc. please share. I wasn't completely happy with the scans; sometimes in the end you've just got to learn and do it yourself. I know I'll invest in my own negative scanner in the near future. I'll also get into medium format at some point. I'm eager to hear from anyone who still loves shooting film.